HatEval

SemEval 2019 Task5: Multilingual detection of hate speech against immigrants and women in Twitter (HatEval) is the international shared task on hate speech detection in English and Spanish tweets. The task is fully described on the CodaLab page.
The HatEval dataser is released under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-4.0 license.
To request the dataset, fill in this form:

Publication

The dataset of the HatEval 2019 shared task is described in the paper SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter.
Please use the following bibtex to cite the paper if you use the data in your research:

@inproceedings{basile-etal-2019-semeval,
    title = "{S}em{E}val-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter",
    author = "Basile, Valerio  and
      Bosco, Cristina  and
      Fersini, Elisabetta  and
      Nozza, Debora  and
      Patti, Viviana  and
      Rangel Pardo, Francisco Manuel  and
      Rosso, Paolo  and
      Sanguinetti, Manuela",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation",
    month = jun,
    year = "2019",
    address = "Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S19-2007",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/S19-2007",
    pages = "54--63",
    abstract = "The paper describes the organization of the SemEval 2019 Task 5 about the detection of hate speech against immigrants and women in Spanish and English messages extracted from Twitter. The task is organized in two related classification subtasks: a main binary subtask for detecting the presence of hate speech, and a finer-grained one devoted to identifying further features in hateful contents such as the aggressive attitude and the target harassed, to distinguish if the incitement is against an individual rather than a group. HatEval has been one of the most popular tasks in SemEval-2019 with a total of 108 submitted runs for Subtask A and 70 runs for Subtask B, from a total of 74 different teams. Data provided for the task are described by showing how they have been collected and annotated. Moreover, the paper provides an analysis and discussion about the participant systems and the results they achieved in both subtasks.",
}